CESTAT Delhi held that responsibility of the Customs Broker under Regulation 10(n) does not include keeping a continuous surveillance on the client. Thus, customs broker cannot be held responsible if client moves to new premises and doesn’t inform authorities.
Bombay High Court sets aside IT refund adjustments for Sulzer Pumps, citing lack of proper notice under Section 245 of the Income Tax Act.
Delhi High Court sets aside GST demand order against APN Sales & Marketing, citing lack of proper notice, and remands the case for reconsideration.
Calcutta High Court dismisses Jyoti Tar Products’ writ petition on denied ITC due to supplier’s cancellation, directing the petitioner to seek an appellate remedy.
Karnataka High Court held that once the dispute is referred to the Labour Court or the Tribunal, the Government will have no power to pass interim order under Section 10-B. Further, passing of interim order without hearing the management is against the principles of natural justice.
Allahabad High Court upholds GST provisional attachment against Rajat Infra Developers, citing tax evasion. Petitioner may appeal under Section 74 of GST Act.
CAIT raises concerns about deceptive opinion trading platforms, urging action to prevent user harm and ensure compliance with IT Rules, 2021.
CESTAT Delhi held that FOB value is the transaction value and customs officer has no right to interfere/ modify the FOB value of the goods. Thus, appeal of exporter’s allowed and order set aside.
Provisional list of audit firms of listed companies yet to file NFRA-2 for 2023-24. Filing deadline was 30.11.2024; fines apply for non-compliance.
List of audit firms yet to file NFRA-2 for 2022-23. Filing deadline was 30.11.2023; penalties apply for non-compliance. Late submissions are still accepted.
