Explore the Kerala High Court ruling in Koduvayur Constructions vs AC-Works Contract case. Understand the significance of GST portal notices and the responsibility of the assessee.
HC held that, that Section 65 (GST Audit by tax authorities) applies only to registered businesses and concluded that authorities cannot conduct audits for businesses that have closed and further clarified that there is no barring in initiating proceeding under Section 73 and 74 of the CGST Act.
ITAT Delhi held that as shares were acquired prior to 01.04.2017, gain derived from sale of such equity shares is exempt under Article 13(4) of India-Mauritius DTAA.
Jharkhand High Court held that the explanation inserted in Rule 89 (4) of CGST Rules, 2017 vide Notification No. 14/2022-Central Tax dated 05.07.2022 is not clarificatory in nature and thus will have a prospective effect.
ITAT Surat held that addition under section 56(2)(x) on the Income Tax Act unsustainable as addition made in casual manner without considering payment made on account of various amenities.
Commissioner, Commercial Tax Vs Ramway Foods Ltd (Allahabad High Court) – Purchase from Registered Dealer can be treated as Purchases from Unregistered Dealer if dealer fails to prove actual physical movement of goods
ITAT Mumbai held that as Form No. 67 has been filed by the Appellant before the processing the return of income under Section 143(1) of the Income Tax Act, foreign tax credit is duly eligible.
CESTAT Mumbai held that as registration numbers were purposefully omitted, accordingly, the genuineness of the invoices are doubtful, the invoices are categorized as inadmissible document.
CESTAT Ahmedabad held that Cenvat Credit is admissible on any material used for construction of building or fabrication of any equipment which in turn used for providing output taxable service. Cenvat on material used in the manufacture of barges which are used for providing output service is admissible.
ITAT Kolkata held that disallowance of loss claimed by the assessee under section 41 of the Income Tax Act in a hypothetical way is unjustified and accordingly matter set aside for afresh examination.
