An in-depth analysis of ITAT Mumbai’s landmark decision in the case of ITO vs Kamalesh Mohandas Lakhwani. Explore why mere suspicion isn’t enough for additions under Section 69B of the Income Tax Act.
The Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) has imposed penalties on United Telecoms Limited for violations related to an Extraordinary General Meeting (EGM) notice. The case revolves around the failure to include a statement regarding the proposed independent director’s qualifications. This article discusses the details of the violation and the penalties imposed. Detailed Analysis United Telecoms […]
Bombay High Court held that dismissal of appeal without hearing the case on merits merely on the ground that matter is remanded back by Commissioner (A) unjustified as remand was only for limited purpose of re-quantification of customs duty.
ITAT Mumbai held that assessee claimed benefit u/s 54 on a different document, whereas ultimately the transaction completed on altogether a different set of conditions and property, which is not permissible to claim benefit u/s. 54 of the Act. Accordingly, benefit u/s. 54 denied.
ITAT Bangalore held that in case of non-resident, income arising in India by way of royalties or technical charges could be taxed in India but that could be only on the receipt basis under India-Switzerland DTAA and not on accrual basis.
ITAT Jodhpur held that merely by transferring the reserve created out of the tax paid profit subsequently transferred to capital account of the firm is not a mistake apparent on record and cannot be rectified under the guise of provision of section 154 of the Act
CESTAT Chandigarh held that service tax demand under reverse charge mechanism unsustainable in case the IPR is registered in any foreign country and is not registered in India.
Delhi HC rules in favor of Jindal Stainless LTD in a tax dispute against DCIT. The court directs the release of excess tax adjustments, limited to 20% of disputed demands. Learn what this means for businesses facing similar tax disputes.
A deep dive into CESTAT Ahmedabad verdict in Hitech Industries Vs C.S.T.-Service Tax. The tribunal clarified that job fabrication does not fall under the category of Manpower Recruitment or Supply Agency Service, setting aside Service Tax demand.
Analysis of ITAT Delhis ruling in Luxor Writing Instruments (P) Ltd Vs DCIT. The tribunal clarifies that the waiver of a loan does not amount to cessation of trading liability under Section 41(1) of the Income Tax Act.
