In this article, we will guide you through the step-by-step procedure of paying your income tax online at Time of Filing of ITR For Individuals using the official Income Tax website.
Read about dismissal of an appeal by ITAT Mumbai in case of BLPL Singapore Pvt Ltd Vs DCIT. Sssessee’s appeal against penalty order under Section 270A for non-disclosure of interest income was dismissed.
CESTAT Kolkata held that as per substituted provisions of Rule 14 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, interest is not leviable where wrongly availed credit is only taken but not utilized.
ITAT Kolkata held that depreciation is allowable on asset of the assessee if acquisition is claimed as application of income. Notably, after change in law in section 11(6), assessee has not claimed acquisition of property towards application of income while computing the total taxable income.
ITAT Amritsar held that rejection of application for registration u/s 12AB of the Income Tax Act unsustainable as there is no violation of section 13(1)(c) by paying remuneration to the full-time working trustee.
ITAT Delhi’s landmark judgement, which annulled late filing fee under Section 234E of the IT Act on grounds of limitation.
Tribunal reiterated that excise duty is a tax on the manufacture, not on the profits made by a dealer on transportation. Thus, the surplus freight charges collected from customers were excluded from the assessable value for excise duty calculation.
In K. Marimuthu Vs Commissioner of GST & Central Excise, Madras High Court allows an appeal beyond statutory period due to a cancer-related delay.
ITAT Amritsar’s ruling in Antony Madassery Vs DCIT case, discussing improper procedure in issuing income tax notices and deletion of penalties under sections 271(1)(b) and 272A(1)(b).
Madras High Courts decision to grant PRM Constructions a three-week extension to file a statutory appeal against Assistant Commissioner of GST & Central Excise, despite expiry of statutory limitation.
