Explore the intricacies of extending the completion date of a real estate project under Section 7(3) of the RERA Act 2016. Understand the application process, required documents, and conditions imposed by the RERA Authority. Stay compliant with RERA regulations for a seamless project development.
Get answers to FAQs about DIR-3 KYC, including who needs to file the form, filing options, required details, fees, and more. Stay compliant with the annual KYC requirements for directors in India.
CESTAT Chennai held that claim of wrong supply made by the supplier merely supported by e-mails, the authenticity of which were never proved before the Adjudicating Authority, is unacceptable.
ITAT Indore held that addition on the standalone basis of statement of assessee u/s 132(4) of the Income Tax Act cannot be held as sustainable in absence of collaborative evidence found in support of such addition.
Guwahati High Court held that writ petition not entertained as the same is hit by the alternative and efficacious remedy available to the petitioners to prefer an appeal before the appellate authority competent to deal with the issues raised in this writ petition.
Madras High Court held that there is no necessity for providing opportunity to each and every member of the Society in the proceedings initiated under Section 34A of the Income Tax Act.
ITAT Hyderabad held that assessee neither before AO nor before CIT(A) could produce any evidence to support his astronomical agricultural income. Accordingly, in absence of evidence, addition sustained.
ITAT Chennai held that rejection of books of accounts justified as transactions recorded in the books of accounts are not properly vouched or supported by proper documents. Further, expenses and related vouchers were also not found in accordance with books of accounts.
ITAT Mumbai held that foreign travelling expenses in respect of spouses who accompanied on official tour with some of the company employees is allowable expenditure.
CESTAT Hyderabad held that all the evidence leads to the conclusion that duty element is treated as an expenditure and not as receivables. Accordingly, as the duty incidence is passed on and therefore hit by doctrine of unjust enrichment.
