Registrar of Companies removed or strike off the names of 454 Companies as per annexure on this day of 29-03-2023 from Register of Companies
Shree Rishabhdev Marble and Minerals Private Limited Vs Commissioner of Customs (Preventive) (CESTAT Delhi) CESTAT find that the present proceedings before this Court emanate from a letter dated 6.1.2020 which cannot be treated as a proper show cause notice. No reason or evidence to support the allegation has been brought on record by the respondent […]
AO observed that the assessee deposited cash of Rs.17.00 lakh in his bank account on different dates during the demonetization period.
Discover what sets the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) 2016 apart from previous insolvency laws in India. Learn about its organization and time-bound procedures.
Discover the impact of the recent Security Transaction Tax (STT) hike on Foreign Portfolio Investors (FPIs). Explore the background, analysis, and potential relocation scenarios for FPIs in response to the increased STT rates. Disclaimer: This article provides personal views and does not constitute professional advice.
The concept of reverse CIRP is not within the ambit of IBC and it is more of a judicial innovation propounded by the Hon’ble NCLAT. The sole purpose of IBC to rehabilitate the corporate debtor by replacing its management through a resolution plan is not fulfilled with the concept of Reverse CIRP.
Chemplast Sanmar Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Chennai) The appellant had contended before the authorities below that as per Section 83 (3) of Chapter VII , Section 83 (5) of Chapter VII of the Finance Act, 2010, Section 94 of the Finance Act, 2004, Section 138 & Section 139 of the Finance Act, 2007 […]
Munna Singh Ex Sales Tax Officer Vs. State of U.P. (Allahabad High Court) 1. Heard Sri Pradeep Kumar Shukla, learned counsel for the accused-applicant as well as Sri Ratnendu Kumar Singh, learned AGA for the State and perused record. 2. The present bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the accused applicant […]
Divya Raghavan Vijayan Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) even though in the order sheet it is written by the ACIT Circle-3 Kalyan that he had issued the 143(2) notice on Aug 30th 2015, but in the same file, I find that the Chief Commissioner has transferred the jurisdiction of assessee’s case from ITO ward-33, Thane to […]
ACIT Vs Ajit Anantrao Pawar (ITAT Mumbai) The facts stated hereinabove by the ld. AR are not in dispute with regard to framing of two independent section 153C assessments for each assessment year. It is not in dispute that six independent appeals were filed by the assessee before the ld CIT(A) and accordingly, numbered thereon […]
