Orissa High Court held that cancellation of last pay certificate without clear and unambiguous reasons and not based on any evidence is liable to be quashed.
CESTAT Delhi held that once the department has accepted that the services of appellant is classified under ‘mining services’, it cannot, simultaneously, classify the same under ‘Technical Testing and Analysis’ and demand service tax thereon.
ITAT Mumbai held that the assessment order passed in variation of the procedures prescribed u/s. 144B of the Income Tax Act would render the assessment order as non est.
In re Uttarakhand Civil Aviation Development Authority (GST AAR Uttarakhand) What will be the classification of services provided by the Heli-Operators by way of transport of passengers by air in case of Helicopter Shuttle Services and What will be the GST rate applicable on the services mentioned in the first question in terms of the notification […]
In re Marubeni India Pvt. Ltd. (GST AAR Karnataka) Whether the supply of goods from the Applicant to the overseas customer is taxable under GST as a zero rated supply or not? The applicant stated that they are a Private Limited Company registered under the provisions of CGST/KGST Act 2017; they are engaged in trading […]
ITAT Mumbai held that that the ‘marked to market loss’ is not a notional loss and is, therefore, allowable expenditure.
GST on supply of aircraft type rating training services to commercial pilots in accordance with training curriculum approved by Directorate General of Civil Aviation for obtaining extension of aircraft type ratings on their existing licenses
Transaction of transfer/sale of one of independent running business divisions of Applicant, namely, business of providing/supplying of engineering services primarily relating to semi-conductor services as a whole, along with all the assets and liabilities of the independent business division on a going concern basis,
ITAT Pune held that default in allotting ‘DIN and Order’ results into quashing of the impugned assessment as according to CBDT circular no. 19/2019 dated 14.08.2019 such an order ought to be treated as to have never been issued herein.
GST AAAR Punjab has delivered a landmark ruling on Bansal Industries, examining the applicability and interpretation of the Notification no. 43/2017-Central Tax (Rate). This judgement sheds light on the contentious issue of who bears the responsibility of tax payment under the Reverse Charge Mechanism (RCM) when raw cotton is supplied by a farmer via a Kacha Arhtiya.
