Ikea Services India Pvt. Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) The TPO has not accepted the decision of the Hon’ble Jurisdictional High Court of Delhi in the case of Li & Fund [supra] solely on the ground that an appeal has been recommended before the Hon’ble Apex Court. In our considered view, when the operation of […]
TV Today Network Ltd. Vs Addl. CIT(A) (ITAT Delhi) Hon’ble Apex Court in case of Exide Industries (Supra) held that the claim with regard to leave encashment has to be allowed on cash basis i.e. actual payment basis and not on accrual basis. It is pertinent to note that the payments with regards to the […]
Appellant is alleged of having availed Input Tax Credit amounting to Rs.15.44 crores on the basis of invoices issued by such non-existent/fake firms without movement of goods, alleged to have been transported by such fake/non-existent transporters, and on the basis of corresponding transport receipts being included in their record for claiming the said benefit.
The law is now well settled that for the purpose of deduction u/s.80M of the Act, only actual expenditure incurred has to be taken into consideration and there cannot be any estimate of expenditure that could be made thereon.
Balaji Services Vs Union of India and others (Madhya Pradesh High Court) As per Section 125 of the Act R/w Rule 3(2)(b) of the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019, the petitioners filed online applications in the prescribed form of SVLDRS-1 which should have been accepted. Due to technical glitch, the petitioners could not […]
Shiva Cement Limited Vs Director of Income Tax (Inv.) (Orissa High Court) It is trite that under Section 132(1) of the Act, the jurisdictional facts should be established by the Department to justify a search authorization. But there cannot be any presumption that there is no such information available with the Department. The observations by […]
Brindavan Bottlers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Goods (CESTAT Allahabad) We find that the appellant have actually entered into an agreement for manufacture on job work basis. Evidently, as per the agreement the job charges have been spread over in two tier billing i.e. fixed charges and variable charges. The reason being that in […]
JCIT (OSD) Vs Adrus Estate and Properties LLP (ITAT Pune) It is an undisputed fact that the land was recorded in the books of account as part of investment. It is settled position that the treatment given in the books of account gives an indication as to the intention of the assessee to hold asset […]
Shailesh Chandra Vs DGGI Jaipur Zonal Unit (Rajasthan High Court) In wake of second surge in the COVID-19 cases, abundant caution is being maintained, while hearing the matters in Court, for the safety of all concerned. This Court perused the material available on record. The petitioner has been arrested in connection with Complaint No.DGGI/INV/GST/2371/2021-Gr-B/O/o ADG-DGGI-ZU- Jaipur […]
Temporarily petitioner was not carrying his business from the premises in question from officially registered premises and they were carrying business in question from home.
