In the light of above discussion, it is clear that, interest in taxation matters has to be levied as a compensation for deprival of entitled funds to revenue within due date. Whereas with respect to input tax credit, such amounts are already being collected by the revenue from the supplier of the taxpayer and levying of interest from the hands of the recipient i.e. taxpayer would unjustly enrich the revenue which is against the principle of levy of interest.
FURNISHING OF GSTR 7 – SECTION 39(3) OF CGST ACT 2017- GST SERIES – PART 27 1. The GSTR-7 form is a monthly return form required to be furnished by all the taxable persons who are required to deduct TDS (Tax Deducted at Source) under 2. Statutory Provisions : Section 39(3) – Every registered person […]
Section 100 of the Finance Act (No. 2), 2019 has been notified on 25/08/2020 vide Notification no. 63/2020-Central Tax Dated 25.08.2020. Strong reactions have been witnessed in last few hours after the aforesaid notification made public. Let us recall the total issue before making any bold reaction.
Kanishka Matta Vs Union of India (Madhya Pradesh High Court) The petitioner’s contention is that the word “money” is not included in Section 67(2) of the CGST Act, 2017 and therefore, once the “money” is not included under Section 67(2) of the CGST Act, 2017 the Investigating Agency / Department is not competent to seize […]
Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs i.e., CBIC issued Notification Number 63/2020 – Central Tax dated 25th August 2020 regarding effective date of notification from 01-Sep-2020 with respect to section 100 of the Finance (No.2) Act, 2019 (23 of 2019) which inter alia discusses about levy of interest under section 50 of CGST Act […]
CBIC today clarified that Notification No. 63/2020-Central Tax dated 25th August 2020 relating to interest on delayed payment of GST has been issued prospectively due to certain technical limitations.
Merely earning surplus by assessee did not result into the conclusion, that assessee was carrying on its activities, which could be termed as business, trade, or commerce, charging a nominal fee to use coding system and to avail of advantages and benefits therein was neither reflective of business aptitude nor indicative of profit-oriented intent. Accordingly, proviso to section 2(15) did not get attracted, and hence, there was no justification for denying exemption under section 11.
On the night of 23rd August 2020, the Commissionerate of Customs (Preventive), West Bengal, seized 25 Antiques at South Dinajpur District of West Bengal which were being taken to Bangladesh, through Kaliyaganj border concealed in a Truck carrying Paddy.
A National e-Assessment Centre (NeAC) and a network of Regional e-Assessment Centres will be set up to implement the Faceless Assessment Scheme of the Income Tax Department, launched nation-wide by Prime Minister Shri Narendra Modi on 13th August, 2020.
The issue under consideration is whether revised amount can be taken as the quantified amount to test the eligibility for Sabka Vikas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 (SVLDR)?