Before GST came into effect, senior citizens residing in retirement communities paid 15% as Service Tax for maintenance charges which was for the services provided by the company that created retirement communities.
Hon’ble Allahabad High Court has in the case of Hariom Steels Pvt Ltd has held that penalty cannot be levied when deeming provisions are applied for assessing income.
This article tries to provide you with a one-stop solution for all the most important, most crucial queries you have regarding registration under the GST regime. All the frequently asked questions of general public are accumulated and assimilated into one place which anyone could refer.
You may aware that, govt. had given some relaxation to the taxpayers regarding filling GSTR 1 up to Sept 2017. As we all are very much into the new regime & trying to address daily issues coming up under GST, we may forget that in less than a month GSTR 3B required to be filed, […]
Extract of Reply Submitted by Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal in Delhi High Court in which he stated that he never asked senior advocate Mr. Ram Jethmalani to pose objectionable questions to Mr. Arun Jaitley or use objectionable words while recording of evidence in the Rs. 10-crore defamation suit initiated by Mr. Arun Jaitley.
GST is applicable to all traders. But some taxpayers wholly wet in the rain of GST and some are totally dry. So in the rain of GST which taxpayers and how preparations to be made that we will discuss.
Gifts upto a value of Rs 50,000/- per year by an employer to his employee are outside the ambit of GST. The Press Release issued on 10th of July by the Finance Ministry clarifying so, also states that service of membership of a club, health and fitness centre provided free of charge to all the […]
This question after GST has sudden emerged in so many users/consumers mind, although same was well described under Service Tax Act but many new questions raised due to merging of all Acts in one Act. I have tried to deal possible situations which may help you understand concept, kindly comment if any contrdict views are there because we all are learner and no one is EXPERT at this satge.
Before the High court, the petitioners, M/S. Kumho Petrochemicals Company Limited And Another, made two submissions. Firstly, the order of continuation of anti-dumping duty, made after expiry of the duty period, is bad in law. Secondly, the initiation of the anti-dumping duty investigation was also bad in law on the ground that public notice of initiation was not published in the Official Gazette before January 01, 2014, i.e., before the expiry of the anti-dumping duty at the end of five years period.
Law does not permit the revenue to reject the amount determined as rent or license fees by the assesse on mere doubt or suspicion. There has to be cogent and satisfactory material to indicate that the rent or fees determined by the parties are not indicative of the fair or market rent.
