In Vodafone International Holdings BV Netherlands vs. Union of India and another (345 ITR 1 (SC). a three judge bench of the Supreme Court has laid down that what is needed is to consider the transaction in its entirety and to look at the transaction as a whole. The Supreme Court has advocated that a transaction must be looked at and not looked through.
The rapid expansion of such NBFCs has led to their increased dependence on public funds, including bank finance. To supplement the prudential measures mentioned above, it is proposed that: banks should reduce their regulatory exposure ceiling in a single NBFC, having gold loans to the extent of 50 per cent or more of its total financial assets, from the existing 10 per cent to 7.5 per cent of bank’s capital funds. However, exposure ceiling may go up by 5 per cent, i.e., up to 12.5 per cent of bank’s capital funds if the additional exposure is on account of funds on-lent by NBFCs to the infrastructure sector; and
Circular No. 966/09/2012-CX As clearly stated in para 3 of Boards’ above circular dated 2.4.2012, it is once again reiterated that in terms of the Rule 2(k) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, while CENVAT Credit is available in respect of parts of Boiler, the same is not admissible in respect of the structural components used for laying of foundation or making of structures for support of capital goods/ Boiler. The above clarification is in conformity with the views expressed in the judgments of the Hon’ble Supreme Court/ different benches of the CESTAT.
Policy Circular No. 65 (RE-2010)/2009-14 It is clarified that Capital Goods sourced from SEZ are treated as ‘imported goods’. Hence, EPCG Scheme-under Para 5.2A is available for import of spares for such imported Capital Goods (i.e. sourced from SEZ) with reduced EO. Besides this, EPCG Authorization for “Spares” is also allowed under Para 5.2 {as clarified in Policy Circular No. 12 dated 17.01.2011 (Point No. 2)}.
Please refer to our Circular UBD.PCB.Cir.No.11/09.09.01/2007-08 dated August 30, 2007 forwarding the guidelines for UCBs on lending to priority sector. In terms of para 7.4 of section I of Annex of the above Circular, assistance given to a non-governmental agency approved by the NHB for the purpose of refinance for construction / reconstruction of dwelling units or for slum clearance and rehabilitation of slum dwellers, subject to a ceiling of loan component of Rs. 5 lakh per dwelling unit, is eligible for classification under priority sector.
Government on Wednesday justified its decision to neutralise the impact of Supreme Court decision in the Vodafone case by amending the Income Tax Act with retrospective effect suggesting it was to prevent outflow of Rs 40,000-Rs 50,000 crore from the exchequer.
Chennai Metro Rail Limited (CMRL), hereinafter referred to as the Client, is the Special Purpose Vehicle of the Government of Tamil Nadu and the Government of lndia for implementation of Phase 1 of the Chennai Metro Rail Project. The GoI and GoTn have approved a Metro Rail project for Chennai in January 2009 with a total budget of INR 14600 crores (US $3 Billion). The project aims to alleviate the traffic problems of the city and reduce vehicular pollution. The Client intends to invite Tenders for Consultants to carry out an Internal Audit function initially for a period of 1 year and will be renewed subject to the performance.
In partial modification of this office order of even number dated 11th May, 2012; and upon consultations of the collegium of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal consisting of the President and two senior-most Vice Presidents, the transfer of Ms. Sushma Chowla, Judicial Member, Chandigarh Benches to Pune Benches is cancelled in public interest. Ms. Sushma Chowla, Judicial Member will continue to function from Chandigarh Benches.
ORDER [NO. F-46-AD(AT)2012], DATED 11-5-2012 In pursuance of the consultations of the collegium of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal consisting of the President and two senior-most Vice Presidents, the following Members of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal are hereby transferred, in public interest, in the same capacity to the Bench(es) of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal as shown against their names, with effect from 28th May, 2012: –
ATTENTION: CAT LEVEL-1 STUDENTS APPEARING FOR EXAM ON 24.6.2012 All the CAT Level-1 students appearing for June’12 CAT Examination are hereby informed that in order to familiarise them with the new pattern of CAT Level-l exam two mock tests are scheduled at their respective CAT Study Centre/ROCC on the below mentioned dates:
