Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Archive: 16 March 2012

Posts in 16 March 2012

Service Tax refund can be refused on the ground of unjust enrichment

March 16, 2012 2614 Views 0 comment Print

The appellant/assessee herein filed a refund application with the authorities on the ground that the service tax paid by them should not have been paid. The adjudicating authority after following the Principles of natural justice, rejected the refund claim on various grounds, including the ground of unjust enrichment.

To claim terminal depreciation asset must be used for purpose of business or profession

March 16, 2012 4804 Views 0 comment Print

The assessee was in the business of offset printing and typesetting. It admittedly had converted this land and factory building into stock-in-trade. The Minutes of the assessee-company did the conversion of the land and factory building into stock-in-trade and the business assets of the assessee no more survived as the business asset eligible for depreciation. Once this happens, the business of the assessee would be deemed to have been discontinued.

RBI Policy March 2012- No Change in repo, reverse repo rates & CRR

March 16, 2012 919 Views 0 comment Print

On the basis of the current macroeconomic assessment, it has been decided to: keep the cash reserve ratio (CRR) of scheduled banks unchanged at 4.75 per cent of their net demand and time liabilities; and keep the policy repo rate under the liquidity adjustment facility (LAF) unchanged at 8.5 per cent. Consequently, the reverse repo rate under the LAF will remain unchanged at 7.5 per cent, and the marginal standing facility (MSF) rate and the Bank Rate at 9.5 per cent.

Addition u/s 68 can be made for non production of lenders

March 16, 2012 2739 Views 0 comment Print

It is not in dispute that there were cash deposits of the equivalent amounts in the bank accounts of the creditors just before advancing loan to the assessee or on the date of issuing cheques to the assessee. In the case of the creditor, ‘RS’, his bank statement is filed in which Rs. 2,50,000 has been deposited, but neither it is mentioned that it was cash nor it is mentioned how the amount similar to the credit was credited in his bank account.

ICAI requests members to share CPC and TDS related issues being faced.

March 16, 2012 1223 Views 0 comment Print

there may be other reasons related to CPC or TDS due to which hardships are being faced by the members. In this regard, may we request you to provide the details of the hardships being faced by you or your clients with regard to CPC and also TDS, giving specific particulars including name and PAN of the assessee.

Budget 2012- Tax Exemption Limit may be raised slightly

March 16, 2012 1289 Views 0 comment Print

Although the Committee had suggested raising the tax exemption limit to Rs 3 lakh, it is unlikely that Mukherjee will agree to it in view of the need to contain fiscal deficit. With limited space for give aways, the Budget is likely to balance populism with some tough measures to check tax evasion and generation of black money.

Assessee not in-default for non-deduction of TDS till certificate issued u/s. 197 is in force

March 16, 2012 2645 Views 0 comment Print

CIT v. Bovis Lend Lease (India) (P.) Ltd. In the instant case, it is the consistent stand of both the assessee and LLAH that the consideration paid under the agreement is by way of reimbursement of actual expanses. Therefore, even when a credit entry was made in the accounts as the assessee was treating it only as a reimbursement of actual expenses, he was under no obligation to deduct tax from the said amount as the said amount did not represent income. When LLAH approached the Assessing Officer and made the aforesaid representation, a certificate under Section 197(1) came to be issued. On the face of the certificate issued under Section 1971(1) being made available to the assesses by LLAH, the assessee could not have deducted tax at source. Therefore, he cannot be treated as a defaulter under law. He is not an assessee in default as understood under Section 201 of the Act.

Applications for stay should not be disposed of in a routine manner unmindful of the consequences

March 16, 2012 360 Views 0 comment Print

The appellant/assessee availed the benefit under the Works Contracts Composition Scheme in respect of contracts entered into prior to 1-6-2007. The respondent/department issued show cause notice proposing service tax, interest and penalty on the ground that the petitioner was not eligible to avail the benefit under the Composition Scheme. Being aggrieved, the petitioner went in appeal under Section 35B of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (the Act).

Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031