Caparo Maruti penalized for failing to appoint a woman director as per Section 149(1) of the Companies Act. Penalties imposed on company and key officers.
Section 203(5) of Companies Act, 2013 imposes penalties for non-compliance with provision regarding appointment of a Whole-time Company Secretary
As per theCompanies Act, 2013, if a company fails to comply with the provisions of Section 137 regarding the filing of financial statements and annual returns within the prescribed timeframe, the Adjudicating Authority (AA) has the power to impose penalties. However, if the company rectifies the default and files the required documents within 30 days […]
Now AO can also do survey u/s 133A of the Income Tax with the prior approval of concerned Principal CCIT/ DG F.No. 282/15/2022-IT (Inv.V)/267 Government of India Ministry of Finance Department of Revenue (Central Board of Direct Taxes) **** Civic Centre, New Delhi- 110002 Dated 22nd Nov, 2022 ORDER Subject: Order under section 119 of […]
IBC Code is structured around timebound resolution of the corporate debtor. Any stakeholder does not have liberty to interpret the provisions which are contrary to the intent on the grounds that in his or her understanding explicit provisions do not warrant a particular action. Seeking extension of time on expiry of deadline is essential requirement […]
Appellants in the present appeal has stated that the Company has made all reasonable efforts to appoint Whole Time Company Secretary, whereas no one has shown interest as the Company incurred losses and delisted from Stock Exchange.
Company is in default for filing its Annual Return for financial years 2018-2019 with office of Registrar of Companies so MCA imposed penalty
Company has not complied with provision of appointment of women director so MCA imposes Penalty of Rs. 211000 which includes initial Penalty of Rs. 50000 and Rs. 1,61,000 for continuing default.
Whereas this office received a communication from Reserve Bank of India vide letter No. DOS.RSS(BLR).No. S91/24.08.028/2022-23 dated 22.04.2022 stating that the letters sent to the subject company to the addressed mentioned in the MCA database were returned undelivered and also that a physical inspection was also made to the premises of the company and it was found that the company was not located at the registered office premises.
The company in its application has submitted that the CIN was not printed in the company’s business letters, bill heads etc. upto 2021. Hence the company has violated the provisions of Section 12(3)(c) of Companies Act, 2013.
