Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Section 269T

Latest Articles


ITAT Upholds Penalty for Loan Repayment in Cash Despite Poor Cheque Clearance History

Income Tax : ITAT upholds penalty against taxpayer for cash repayment of loans, contravening Section 269T of Income-tax Act. Explore implicatio...

March 14, 2024 876 Views 0 comment Print

Legitimacy of repayments through Journal Entries – Whether liable to penalty?

Income Tax : Explore the impact of Income Tax Sections 269SS, 269ST, 269SU, and 269T on transactions via Journal/Book Entries. Learn about legi...

February 27, 2024 5949 Views 0 comment Print

Understanding Income Tax Sections 269SS & 269T in India

Company Law : Explore the impact of Income Tax sections 269SS & 269T in India, designed to curb tax evasion. Learn scenarios, exceptions, penalt...

January 24, 2024 1899 Views 0 comment Print

Prohibited transaction in cash/limit on cash transactions

Income Tax : Discover why Section 40A(3) limits cash payments and promotes a cashless economy, including reduction of black money generation. P...

November 1, 2023 20835 Views 0 comment Print

Analysis of Section 269SS, 269ST & 269T of the Income Tax Act

Income Tax : Explore intricacies of Sections 269SS, 269T, and 269ST of Income Tax Act, 1961. Learn how these sections aim to curb cash transact...

September 9, 2023 32268 Views 1 comment Print


Latest News


SIT report: Restrict Cash Transaction/Holding to curb black money

Income Tax : It is suggested that there should be a positive provision under the I.T. Act that any transaction involving more than Rs.3,00,000/...

July 14, 2016 23827 Views 0 comment Print


Latest Judiciary


Penalty u/s. 271D unwarranted as reasonable cause shown for cash receipt on sale of property: ITAT Bangalore

Income Tax : ITAT Bangalore held that imposition of penalty under section 271D of the Income Tax Act unwarranted as reasonable cause shown for ...

August 15, 2024 558 Views 0 comment Print

Initiation of Section 271D/271E penalty must arise out of assessment proceedings

Income Tax : ITAT Bangalore held penalty initiation under Sections 271D/271E must be noted in assessment order; temporary family loans without ...

August 13, 2024 174 Views 0 comment Print

No penalty for cash loan from Directors for Business Exigency: ITAT Chennai

Income Tax : Read the detailed analysis of ITAT Chennai's decision on penalties under sections 269SS and 269T for Pearl Beach Promoters P. Ltd....

July 18, 2024 465 Views 0 comment Print

ITAT Delhi explains limitation for passing of penalty order

Income Tax : Detailed analysis of ITO vs Turner General Entertainment Networks India Pvt. Ltd. case before ITAT Delhi. Penalty order deemed inv...

June 13, 2024 456 Views 0 comment Print

Section 269SS & 269T Not Applicable to Share Application Money; No Penalty Under Section 271D or 271E

Income Tax : Calcutta High Court held that share application money or its repayment does not fall under Section 269SS & 269T, as the same are n...

May 24, 2024 1992 Views 0 comment Print


Latest Notifications


CBDT notifies more modes of e-payments; 6DD limit reduced to ₹ 10000

Income Tax : Notification No. 8/2020-Income-Tax- CBDT has notified Other electronic modes by inserting New Income TAx Rule 6ABBA. It also amend...

January 29, 2020 12972 Views 0 comment Print

CBDT relaxes PAN requirement for Section 269T reporting in 3CD

Income Tax : G.S.R. 841(E).—In the notification of the Government of India, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue (Central Board of Dire...

July 6, 2017 6045 Views 1 comment Print

CBDT amends form 3CD to revise reporting U/s. 269SS & 269T

Income Tax : In the Income-tax Rules, 1962, in Appendix II, in Form No. 3CD, for serial number 31 and the entries relating thereto the followin...

July 3, 2017 130068 Views 9 comments Print

Section 269SS and 269T applicable to NBFC: RBI

Fema / RBI : Section 269SS and 269T of the Income Tax Act, 1961, the requirements under the Income Tax Act, 1961, as amended from time to time,...

March 9, 2017 18216 Views 0 comment Print


Brief Study of Section 269ST of Income Tax Act, 1961

April 3, 2019 15363 Views 0 comment Print

In this article we will understand why section 269ST is introduced and what is the need of invoking such provisions, Section 269ST was introduced by finance act, 2017 in Income tax act, 1961 by the central government in order to curb the tax evasion, regulation and circulation of Black money. Most of the transactions in […]

ITAT deletes penalty on Cash loan taken from unorganized finance sector to repay lenders

April 1, 2019 1218 Views 0 comment Print

M/s. P.R. Associates Vs ACIT (ITAT Pune) We find that the assessee specifically submitted before the AO during the course of penalty proceedings, which fact has also been captured in the penalty order, that its business was inoperative for the last 7 years and it had already borrowed loans from Shree Suvarna Sahakari Bank Ltd. […]

Cash Loan- Penalty justified on failure to establish Business exigency or urgency 

March 23, 2019 1254 Views 0 comment Print

M. Sougoumarin Vs ACIT (Madras High Court) High Court held that there was no such reason for regular loan transactions of borrowing and repayment in cash of amounts exceeding Rs.20,000/- so as to escape penal liability under Sections 271E and 271D of the IT Act. FULL TEXT OF THE HIGH COURT ORDER / JUDGMENT These […]

Penalty not leviable for cash loan taken/paid to comply re-settlement scheme of BIFR

March 2, 2019 1704 Views 0 comment Print

Assessee was not liable for penalty under section 271D and 271E for availing cash loans/deposits in violation of section 269SS and 269T as it had availed the facility in order to re-establish itself, and for fulfilment of promises given for the purpose of BIFR which was a reasonable cause foe not levying penalty.

Section 269SS not applies to loan transaction between husband and wife

February 21, 2019 7593 Views 0 comment Print

Provisions of section 269SS was not applicable to the loan transaction between husband and wife because there was no relationship of the depositor or a creditor and no interest of parties were involved.

Relaxation of Penalty U/S 271DA for Violation of Section 269ST

January 11, 2019 54171 Views 6 comments Print

Finance Act 2017, instead of amending section 273B, inserted a proviso to section 271DA itself to the effect that, no penalty shall be imposable if such person proves that there were good and sufficient reasons for the contravention of section 269ST. However, what could constitute good and sufficient reasons for contravention have not been defined.

Reportable / Cash Transactions and TCS – Limit and Penalty

December 15, 2018 21738 Views 0 comment Print

Article covers Cash Transactions provisions (Section 269SS, 269T, 269ST, 43), Reportable Transaction provisions (Section 285BA, Rule 114E) and Transaction on which Tax has to be collected at Source (TCS) (Section 206C)

HC upheld penalty for Cash Loan exceeding Rs. 20000 Taken & repaid

September 17, 2018 2067 Views 0 comment Print

These appeals are against an order dated 31-3-2016 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal B Bench, Chennai, allowing the appeals, being I.T.A.Nos.262 and 263/Mds/2015, in relation to the assessment years 2008-2009 and 2012-2013 filed by the respondent Revenue and restoring the penalty imposed by the Assessing Officer under Sections 271E and 271D of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the IT Act).

Brief Study of Section 269SS, 269T, 68 and 69 of Income Tax Act,1961

September 3, 2018 69483 Views 12 comments Print

There are very few things in this world which are both Legal & Lethal. TAX is one of them. If tax provisions are not understood properly or tax is not paid in proper time, it is enough to give you hypertension. Moreover it is important to know what are the sections that affect your daily transactions and how these transactions are dealt with in Assessment proceedings. Hence it is very important to have some elementary knowledge of such Tax Provisions.

No Penalty U/s. 271E on cash refund of advance from customers under Bonafide Belief

August 23, 2018 5601 Views 0 comment Print

 M/s. Orison Transport Vs DCIT (ITAT Cuttack) Belief of the assessee that return of advance from customers is not prohibited by section 269T was a bonafide belief. Therefore, the levy of penalty u/s.271E of the Act of Rs.21,49,943/- cannot be sustained. FULL TEXT OF THE ITAT JUDGMENT This is an appeal filed by the assessee against […]

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
August 2024
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031