Income Tax : ITAT held that additions based solely on third-party search material without independent evidence or cross-examination are invalid...
Income Tax : A detailed look at how the Finance Act, 2021 reshaped Sections 147–151, introduced Section 148A, and reduced limitation periods ...
Income Tax : The Finance Bill, 2026 clarifies who can issue notices under sections 148 and 148A. It confirms that only jurisdictional Assessing...
Goods and Services Tax : The court held that once late fee is imposed for delayed annual return filing, a further general penalty is not permissible. Secti...
Income Tax : The issue was whether an assessment could be reopened after four years. The Court held that full disclosure by the taxpayer barred...
Income Tax : Learn about the new block assessment provisions for cases involving searches under section 132 and requisitions under section 132A...
Income Tax : Discover how Finance Act 2021 revamped assessment and reassessment procedures under Income-tax Act, impacting notices, time limits...
Income Tax : Income Tax Gazetted Officers’ Association requested CBDT to issue Clarification in respect of the judgement of Hon’ble Supreme...
Income Tax : In view of Indiscriminate notices by income Tax Department without allowing reasonable time it is requested to Finance Ministry an...
Income Tax : Lucknow CA Tax Practicioners Association has made a Representation to FM for Extension of Time Limit for Assessment cases time bar...
Income Tax : The issue was deletion of additions on unsecured loans treated as unexplained cash credits. The tribunal upheld deletion, holding ...
Income Tax : The issue involved dismissal of appeal due to delay and non-appearance. The tribunal condoned the delay citing medical reasons and...
Income Tax : The issue was whether reassessment could be initiated after four years without fresh evidence. The court held such reopening inval...
Income Tax : The issue was whether reassessment notice issued without approval from the correct authority is valid. The tribunal held it invali...
Income Tax : The Court held that reassessment proceedings must be initiated within the statutory time limit. It found the notice issued after t...
Income Tax : ITAT Chandigarh held that ITO Ward-3(1), Chandigarh had no jurisdiction to issue notice to an NRI and hence consequently the asses...
Excise Duty : Notification No. 29/2024-Central Excise rescinds six 2022 excise notifications in the public interest, effective immediately. Deta...
Income Tax : Learn how to initiate proceedings under section 147 of the IT Act in e-Verification cases. Detailed instructions for Assessing Off...
Income Tax : Explore e-Verification Instruction No. 2 of 2024 from the Directorate of Income Tax (Systems). Detailed guidelines for AOs under I...
Income Tax : Supreme Court in the matter of Shri Ashish Agarwal, several representations were received asking for time-barring date of such cas...
Mumbai ITAT sets aside penalty under section 271B, citing previous penalty under section 271A for non-maintenance of accounts in Haresh Ghanshyamdas Makhija vs ITO case.
Discover Mumbai ITAT order on Capacite Infra Projects Ltd Vs DCIT, analyzing disallowance of non-genuine/Bogus purchases and its implications on tax assessment.
Delve into the case of Paramjit Singh Vs PCIT (ITAT Delhi) regarding jurisdiction under section 263 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and its impact on reassessment orders.
ITAT Kolkata held that addition u/s. 68 of the Income Tax Act towards unexplained share application money is unsustainable as assessee has successfully discharged the burden of proof primarily casted upon it, however, AO failed to conduct independent inquires.
In the case of ACIT Vs Aaryavart Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Ahmedabad ruled that mere maintenance of a bank account with a social co-operative bank cannot be a basis for assuming that the assessee is engaged in accommodation entries. Get insights into the case and the tribunal’s decision.
Delve into the crucial judgment of Orchid Infrastructure Developers Pvt Ltd Vs PCIT, where the Delhi High Court ruled against reopening assessments under Section 147/148 after a final settlement order under Section 245D(4).
In the absence of “reason to believe” recorded by the authorities, revenue authorities had hopelessly failed to bring out to recordthat the goods (here Arecanuts) imported from outside the country was without valid customs clearance.
Learn how to initiate proceedings under section 147 of the IT Act in e-Verification cases. Detailed instructions for Assessing Officers provided.
Kolkata ITAT remits case of Dahisar Traders Pvt Ltd vs ITO due to failure in substantiating identity & fund source, demanding re-adjudication. Full order details.
Read the detailed analysis of Manu Stock Broking Pvt Ltd Vs ACIT case by Mumbai ITAT. Learn how additional issues impacted proceedings under section 147/148 of the Income Tax Act.
