Corporate Law : Explains how recent tribunal decisions shaped the rules for selling corporate debtors as going concerns, highlighting compliance...
Corporate Law : The Tripartite Agreement Trap: When Banks Lose Financial Creditor Status in Real Estate Insolvency This case memo discussed the ru...
Corporate Law : NCLAT holds that time spent in pending Debt Recovery Tribunal proceedings cannot be excluded under Section 14 of the Limitation Ac...
Corporate Law : RTI inquiry into NCLT/NCLAT reveals member vacancies, lack of consolidated case data, and opaque appointments, highlighting need f...
Corporate Law : The NCLAT ruled that provident fund dues are not corporate debtor assets and must be paid in full during CIRP, prioritizing them o...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court upheld joint insolvency proceedings against two interconnected real estate companies due to common management an...
Corporate Law : From 2022-23 to 2024-25, appeals filed at NCLAT rose steadily, with IBC cases forming the majority, reflecting active engagement i...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court ruled that CoC and RP can surrender financially burdensome assets voluntarily, clarifying moratorium under section 1...
Corporate Law : SC clarifies limits of High Court's writ powers in IBC cases and recognises Indian CIRP as foreign main proceeding in cross-border...
Corporate Law : NCLT & NCLAT eligibility criteria, insolvency rules, and case statistics from 2022-2024. Updates on financial irregularities and r...
Corporate Law : NCLAT held that foreign oil and gas assets owned through Videocon subsidiaries could not be included in the CIRP of Videocon Indus...
Corporate Law : NCLAT held that a joint venture arrangement did not prevent insolvency proceedings where separate agreements clearly imposed suppl...
Company Law : A resolution applicant could not unilaterally alter its financial proposal through a last minute addendum after completion of the ...
Corporate Law : NCLAT held that the Corporate Debtor’s email offering payment subject to acceptance of a consequence sheet amounted to acknowled...
Company Law : The Appellate Tribunal upheld findings that the arrangement allowing the Successful Resolution Applicant to receive 50% of PUFE re...
Corporate Law : IBBI orders disciplinary action against Mr. S Vasudevan for alleged violations in the insolvency process of Mega Foods Products Ma...
Corporate Law : IBBI suspends IP for Failure to act during CIRP despite NCLAT directive and for Delay in convening Committee of Creditors (CoC) me...
Corporate Law : Read about the IBBI's disciplinary action against Mr. Venkata Sivakumar, an Interim Resolution Professional, for sharing asset mem...
Corporate Law : Govt issued a circular detailing vacancies for Judicial & Technical Members posts in NCLAT with detailed guide to apply for these...
Fema / RBI : It is clarified that cases admitted with National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT)/National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) unde...
NCLAT Delhi ruling on Adisri Commercial Pvt. Ltd. Vs RBI & Ors. : Recall applications filed by Appellant are nothing but application to review judgment on merits which power is not vested with Adjudicating Authority.
Join the discussion on MCA’s proposed changes to Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code rules. Learn how to participate and share your insights!
Supreme Court refuses to entertain appeal challenging NCLAT’s remand of NCLT order on Resolution Plan approval. Get insights on the case between Bank of Baroda and Suchi Paper Mills.
Detailed analysis of Deccan Value Investors L.P. & Anr vs. Dinkar Venkatasubramanian & Anr case. Supreme Court prohibits withdrawal or modification of resolution plans after Committee of Creditors’ approval.
NCLAT decision bars new applicants from participating in CIRP without fresh Form G issuance, impacting Mamta Binani case. Full judgment analysis here.
Read about the IBBI’s disciplinary action against Mr. Venkata Sivakumar, an Interim Resolution Professional, for sharing asset memorandum with prospective bidders.
NCLAT Delhi rejects SRA’s plea for substitution in resolution plan after CoC and NCLT approval. Analysis of UV Asset Reconstruction Company Ltd. & Anr. vs Aircel Ltd. case.
NCLAT held that rights of allottees are safeguarded in CIRP, with RP empowered to make decisions regarding business operations. Details of the judgment provided.
In a case between D S Kulkarni & Associates and Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, NCLAT Delhi ruled that mere MoU & Ledger Extract are inadequate to claim financial debt, rejecting the appeal.
Read a detailed analysis of the NCLT judgment in Tek Chand Narula vs Vatika Ltd. Understand the dispute over assured returns and the implications of the BUDS Act.
