Corporate Law : Explains how recent tribunal decisions shaped the rules for selling corporate debtors as going concerns, highlighting compliance...
Corporate Law : The Tripartite Agreement Trap: When Banks Lose Financial Creditor Status in Real Estate Insolvency This case memo discussed the ru...
Corporate Law : NCLAT holds that time spent in pending Debt Recovery Tribunal proceedings cannot be excluded under Section 14 of the Limitation Ac...
Corporate Law : RTI inquiry into NCLT/NCLAT reveals member vacancies, lack of consolidated case data, and opaque appointments, highlighting need f...
Corporate Law : The NCLAT ruled that provident fund dues are not corporate debtor assets and must be paid in full during CIRP, prioritizing them o...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court upheld joint insolvency proceedings against two interconnected real estate companies due to common management an...
Corporate Law : From 2022-23 to 2024-25, appeals filed at NCLAT rose steadily, with IBC cases forming the majority, reflecting active engagement i...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court ruled that CoC and RP can surrender financially burdensome assets voluntarily, clarifying moratorium under section 1...
Corporate Law : SC clarifies limits of High Court's writ powers in IBC cases and recognises Indian CIRP as foreign main proceeding in cross-border...
Corporate Law : NCLT & NCLAT eligibility criteria, insolvency rules, and case statistics from 2022-2024. Updates on financial irregularities and r...
Corporate Law : NCLAT held that foreign oil and gas assets owned through Videocon subsidiaries could not be included in the CIRP of Videocon Indus...
Corporate Law : NCLAT held that a joint venture arrangement did not prevent insolvency proceedings where separate agreements clearly imposed suppl...
Company Law : A resolution applicant could not unilaterally alter its financial proposal through a last minute addendum after completion of the ...
Corporate Law : NCLAT held that the Corporate Debtor’s email offering payment subject to acceptance of a consequence sheet amounted to acknowled...
Company Law : The Appellate Tribunal upheld findings that the arrangement allowing the Successful Resolution Applicant to receive 50% of PUFE re...
Corporate Law : IBBI orders disciplinary action against Mr. S Vasudevan for alleged violations in the insolvency process of Mega Foods Products Ma...
Corporate Law : IBBI suspends IP for Failure to act during CIRP despite NCLAT directive and for Delay in convening Committee of Creditors (CoC) me...
Corporate Law : Read about the IBBI's disciplinary action against Mr. Venkata Sivakumar, an Interim Resolution Professional, for sharing asset mem...
Corporate Law : Govt issued a circular detailing vacancies for Judicial & Technical Members posts in NCLAT with detailed guide to apply for these...
Fema / RBI : It is clarified that cases admitted with National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT)/National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) unde...
Explore the AVJ Heights vs. India Infoline case, NCLAT’s stance on Section 185 compliance in CIRP claims, implications for financial institutions, and legal analysis.
“In the Milind Kashiram Jadhav vs. State Bank of India case, NCLAT Delhi examines if loan recall notice or NPA declaration determines default date under IBC Code.”
NCLAT clarifies that absence of GST refund/ITC claim in demand notice or Form 5 is not grounds for default under CIRP as per Section 9 of IBC.
NCLAT Delhi rules on Sanam Fashion Vs Ktex Nonwovens case, addressing a pre-existing contractual dispute on delivery terms and goods transportation under IBC.
Read the detailed analysis of Namdev Hindurao Patil’s appeal against his ineligibility to submit a resolution plan for Warana Dairy. Learn how the NCLAT dismissed his plea.
Analysis of Pooja Mehra vs Victory Ace case before NCLAT Delhi. Understanding IBC time limits, belated claims, and implications for creditors. Detailed judgment breakdown.
Delve into the legal intricacies of New Era Propcon Pvt. Ltd. vs SREI Equipment Finance Ltd. case at NCLAT Delhi. Detailed analysis, implications, and conclusions explored.
Ensuring timely insolvency resolution, IBC mandates strict timelines; a liberal approach would undermine its objectives. Korah John Vs JM Financial Asset Reconstruction Company Ltd. (NCLAT Chennai)
In the State Bank of India vs. Supreme Panvel Indapur Tollways Pvt. Ltd. case, NCLAT Delhi grants time for rejoinder with a cost of Rs. 25,000, dismissing other directives.
Explore recent Supreme Court rulings on dissenting creditor rights and set-off claims in insolvency cases. Detailed analysis of key judgments explained.
