Company Law : The article examines the Hamlin Trust ruling, where the NCLAT held that CFO appointments must satisfy Section 203 eligibility requ...
Corporate Law : Explains how recent tribunal decisions shaped the rules for selling corporate debtors as going concerns, highlighting compliance...
Corporate Law : The Tripartite Agreement Trap: When Banks Lose Financial Creditor Status in Real Estate Insolvency This case memo discussed the ru...
Corporate Law : NCLAT holds that time spent in pending Debt Recovery Tribunal proceedings cannot be excluded under Section 14 of the Limitation Ac...
Corporate Law : RTI inquiry into NCLT/NCLAT reveals member vacancies, lack of consolidated case data, and opaque appointments, highlighting need f...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court upheld joint insolvency proceedings against two interconnected real estate companies due to common management an...
Corporate Law : From 2022-23 to 2024-25, appeals filed at NCLAT rose steadily, with IBC cases forming the majority, reflecting active engagement i...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court ruled that CoC and RP can surrender financially burdensome assets voluntarily, clarifying moratorium under section 1...
Corporate Law : SC clarifies limits of High Court's writ powers in IBC cases and recognises Indian CIRP as foreign main proceeding in cross-border...
Corporate Law : NCLT & NCLAT eligibility criteria, insolvency rules, and case statistics from 2022-2024. Updates on financial irregularities and r...
Corporate Law : NCLAT held that invoice discounting through the TReDS platform does not convert operational debt into financial debt. The appeal w...
Corporate Law : Madras HC held that a pending NCLAT appeal did not prevent PNB from conducting a Swiss Challenge auction after the OTS proposal wa...
Company Law : The NCLAT held that CFO nominees must satisfy the eligibility requirements under Section 203 of the Companies Act. It set aside th...
Income Tax : NCLAT held that a single application covering multiple years and company officers is maintainable in the absence of any statutory ...
Corporate Law : Tribunal held that proviso to Regulation 7A allows insolvency professionals to continue assignments already underway even after th...
Corporate Law : IBBI orders disciplinary action against Mr. S Vasudevan for alleged violations in the insolvency process of Mega Foods Products Ma...
Corporate Law : IBBI suspends IP for Failure to act during CIRP despite NCLAT directive and for Delay in convening Committee of Creditors (CoC) me...
Corporate Law : Read about the IBBI's disciplinary action against Mr. Venkata Sivakumar, an Interim Resolution Professional, for sharing asset mem...
Corporate Law : Govt issued a circular detailing vacancies for Judicial & Technical Members posts in NCLAT with detailed guide to apply for these...
Fema / RBI : It is clarified that cases admitted with National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT)/National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) unde...
Analysis of Pooja Mehra vs Victory Ace case before NCLAT Delhi. Understanding IBC time limits, belated claims, and implications for creditors. Detailed judgment breakdown.
Delve into the legal intricacies of New Era Propcon Pvt. Ltd. vs SREI Equipment Finance Ltd. case at NCLAT Delhi. Detailed analysis, implications, and conclusions explored.
Ensuring timely insolvency resolution, IBC mandates strict timelines; a liberal approach would undermine its objectives. Korah John Vs JM Financial Asset Reconstruction Company Ltd. (NCLAT Chennai)
In the State Bank of India vs. Supreme Panvel Indapur Tollways Pvt. Ltd. case, NCLAT Delhi grants time for rejoinder with a cost of Rs. 25,000, dismissing other directives.
Explore recent Supreme Court rulings on dissenting creditor rights and set-off claims in insolvency cases. Detailed analysis of key judgments explained.
NCLAT Chennai rules against FLSmidth Pvt Ltd, stating liquidator lacks authority to decide matters involving claims and counterclaims in insolvency cases.
NCLAT held that CoC’s decision not to liquidate did not constitute a modification of resolution plan and extension of time for payment was reasonable.
NCLAT Chennai held that liability arising from a recovery certificate constitutes a financial debt under IBC. Therefore, application filed by PARAS is not barred by limitation.
Delhi High Court sets aside CCI’s order, ruling that penal interest can’t be imposed without following proper procedure. Detailed analysis of Geep Industries (India) Pvt. Ltd. & Ors Vs Competition Commission of India.
Explore the intricacies of the Arunkumar Jayantilal Muchhala vs Awaita Properties Pvt. Ltd. case from NCLAT Delhi. Dive into the dispute over financial debt, default claims, and legal intricacies.
