ITAT Judgment contain Income Tax related Judgments from Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Across India which includes ITAT Mumbai, Chennai, Delhi, Kolkutta, Hyderabad etc.
Income Tax : Article examines whether the MLI Principal Purpose Test has domestic effect under Section 90(1) following Nestlé SA and Sky High ...
Corporate Law : The article argues that failure to comply before the AO or CIT(A) can lead to adverse assessments, as higher forums generally cann...
Income Tax : ITAT held that Section 54 exemption must be examined separately for each residential house sold. Aggregating gains from multiple t...
Income Tax : ITAT held that delayed filing of Form 10B cannot defeat Section 11 exemption if the audit report is available before processing un...
Income Tax : Smt. Ranjana Kumari/Kalta Vs DCIT/ACIT (Central) (ITAT Chandigarh) The appeals involved three assessees belonging to the Kalta Gro...
Income Tax : ITAT Bangalore held Section 2(47)(v) inapplicable as the JDA did not satisfy Section 53A conditions, deleting capital gains for AY...
Income Tax : The issue concerns massive backlog in ITAT caused by unfilled positions and delayed appointments. The intervention highlights that...
Income Tax : A representation seeks doubling the SMC threshold due to inflation and higher dispute values. The key takeaway is that increasing ...
Income Tax : The tribunal held that a gift deed alone cannot establish legitimacy under Section 68. It directed fresh scrutiny of the donor’s...
Income Tax : Delhi ITAT allows Sanco Holding, a Norwegian company, to compute income from bareboat charter of seismic vessels under Article 21(...
Income Tax : ITAT Kolkata quashed the assessment as the jurisdictional Assessing Officer did not issue the mandatory notice under Section 143(2...
Income Tax : Bangalore ITAT deleted Section 40(a)(ia), notional interest, ICDS and Section 68 additions, citing Form 26A compliance and evident...
Income Tax : Bangalore ITAT remanded FD interest addition, directing verification of fund ownership and held Form 26AS alone is not determinati...
Income Tax : Bangalore ITAT held entire alleged bogus purchases cannot be added where sales are accepted, restricting the addition to 1.15% pro...
Income Tax : Bangalore ITAT held TP adjustments apply only to international AE transactions and upheld verified capacity, working capital and o...
Income Tax : The ITAT Delhi has revised its hearing notice protocols. Physical notices will now be sent only once, with subsequent dates availa...
Income Tax : ITAT Chandigarh held that ITO Ward-3(1), Chandigarh had no jurisdiction to issue notice to an NRI and hence consequently the asses...
Income Tax : Central Government is pleased to appoint Shri G. S. Pannu, Vice-President of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, as President of th...
Income Tax : Ministry of Finance notified rules for appointment of members in various tribunals on 12.02.2020 in which practice of judicial and...
Income Tax : Bhagyalaxmi Conclave Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Kolkata) In the remand report, the AO clearly stated that notice u/s 143(2) of the Ac...
The Delhi ITAT has dismissed an appeal from Edynamics Solutions, upholding the taxation of large-scale banking transactions, and rejecting the claim of a 2% commission.
The ITAT has deleted transfer pricing adjustments for Avaada group companies, ruling that Section 115BAB doesn’t apply to pre-operative businesses with no taxable income.
The Delhi ITAT has ruled that an income enhancement by a CIT(A) is illegal if done without a mandatory notice under Section 251. The Tribunal set aside the order and restored the original assessment.
ITAT Bangalore sets aside tax demand of ₹7.29 crore on a rural co-op society, citing its inability to explain a ₹4.63 crore cash deposit due to a negligent tax practitioner.
The ITAT has quashed an income tax assessment against Dinesh Kumar Jain, ruling that a mere code name, “Thekedar,” in seized data was not enough to prove unaccounted income without corroborative evidence.
The ITAT quashed a final assessment order against a company that no longer existed due to amalgamation, ruling the order void despite departmental knowledge of the merger.
The ITAT quashed an assessment against Karan Motors, ruling it was void because the Income Tax Department failed to prove the ACIT’s jurisdiction to act as the Assessing Officer.
The ITAT Delhi has directed the tax department to apply the 22% concessional tax rate to Kworks Technologies, citing a procedural lapse in late filing of a tax form.
ITAT Jaipur provides relief to Sharad Kumar Choradia. Though seized records prove bro-kerage, the court remands the case, ordering a realistic re-evaluation of income and a deduction for expenses.
The ITAT Delhi quashed a CIT(A) order passed against a deceased taxpayer, ruling it a nullity. The case was remanded to be decided in the name of the legal heir.
