Goods and Services Tax : GST IMS allows taxpayers to accept, reject or keep invoices pending before ITC flows to GSTR-3B, ensuring better GST ITC reconcili...
Goods and Services Tax : The High Court ruled that GST authorities must mandatorily apply Circular No. 183/15/2022-GST before disallowing ITC due to return...
Goods and Services Tax : The court held that Section 74 cannot be used unless fraud, wilful misstatement, or suppression with intent to evade tax is specif...
Goods and Services Tax : Learn why GSTR-2B, 2A, and books differ, how mismatches occur, and the steps founders must take to claim ITC correctly and stay au...
Goods and Services Tax : How AI-powered tools streamline GSTR-2A & GSTR-2B reconciliation for Chartered Accountants. Learn about automated GST reconciliati...
Goods and Services Tax : Recent amendments in GSTR-9 and GSTR-9C have increased compliance complexity, prompting calls for extended deadlines to allow accu...
Goods and Services Tax : GSTN – Upcoming changes/initiatives:- ♦ SMS based NIL Return filing for GSTR-3B and GSTR-1. ♦ Improvements in GSTR-2A to sho...
Goods and Services Tax : 1. Certain notified taxpayers have been issuing invoices after obtaining Invoice Reference Number (IRN) from Invoice Registration ...
Goods and Services Tax : Direct Taxes Professionals’ Association requested Hon’ble Finance Minister to allow filing of GSTR 9, 9A and 9C for the F.Y. 2...
Goods and Services Tax : GSTN enables taxpayers to know Input Tax Credit (ITC) eligibility at invoice level while filing Annual Return – Taxpayers ar...
Goods and Services Tax : The Karnataka High Court held that Input Tax Credit could not be denied merely because GSTR-2A did not reflect imports and SEZ pro...
Goods and Services Tax : The assessment was based on four discrepancies: reconciliation issues between GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B, input tax credit (ITC) mismatch ...
Goods and Services Tax : The Karnataka High Court ruled that ITC for FY 2018-19 cannot be denied merely because import and SEZ transactions were absent fro...
Goods and Services Tax : The Madras High Court remanded an ex parte assessment arising from a GSTR-3B and GSTR-2A mismatch after finding that the assessee ...
Goods and Services Tax : The High Court set aside the GST demand for fresh adjudication after finding that the authorities had not properly examined stock ...
Goods and Services Tax : Read Circular No. 193/05/2023-GST from CBIC regarding the clarification on availing Input Tax Credit (ITC) in GSTR-3B and GSTR-2A ...
Goods and Services Tax : Clarification to deal with difference in Input Tax Credit (ITC) availed in FORM GSTR-3B as compared to that detailed in FORM GSTR-...
Goods and Services Tax : It has been noticed that in a few cases, certain records are not reflected in GSTR-2B statement for the period of April 2022. Howe...
Goods and Services Tax : Condition made under sub-rule (4) of rule 36 of the CGST Rules shall apply cumulatively for the tax period February, March, April,...
Goods and Services Tax : The GST Council, in its 39th meeting held on 14th March 2020, had recommended to adopt and implement the incremental approach of...
Read the full judgment of Madras High Court’s decision to quash a GST order against APL Apollo Tubes Limited due to lack of specific reasons for denying Input Tax Credit.
In a landmark decision, Madras High Court overturns a GST order against Larsen & Toubro, citing discrepancies between GSTR-2A and GSTR-3B returns. Full analysis here.
Read the full text of the judgment where Bombay High Court quashes an assessment order, citing violation of principles of natural justice and denial of fair personal hearing.
Dive into the case of Subh Sri Agencies Vs Deputy State Tax Officer where the High Court addresses discrepancies in GST returns due to customs duty Input Tax Credit.
Madras High Court set aside assessment GST order in Sri Lakshmi Silvers Vs State Tax Officer, citing breaches of natural justice principles and non-adherence to prescribed procedures regarding GST returns.
Delhi High Court rules GST registration to be cancelled from the date of application, overturning rejection due to lack of details in the order.
Madras High Court quashes assessment order for availing lower Input Tax Credit than reflected in GSTR 2A, citing non-application of mind. Details of the judgment here.
Learn about the legal implications, remedies, and judicial precedents regarding claiming excess Input Tax Credit (ITC) in GSTR-3B compared to GSTR-2A/2B. Navigate through notices, circulars, and court rulings.
Philips Auto Agencies (India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs State Tax Officer (Kerala High Court) Introduction: Philips Auto Agencies (India) Pvt. Ltd. approached the Kerala High Court after being denied Input Tax Credit (ITC) under the Goods and Services Tax (GST) Act for the fiscal year 2018-19. The denial was attributed to a discrepancy between GSTR-2A and […]
Learn how Madras High Court ruled against denial of GST Input Tax Credit due to a mismatch between GSTR-3B and GSTR-2A, citing a clerical error in GSTIN indication.
