The Companies Act is a legislation that governs the formation, functioning, and management of companies. Explore the key provisions, compliance requirements, and legal framework under the Companies Act.
Company Law : The Companies Act, 2013 and related rules now require most public and private companies to issue and transfer securities only in d...
Company Law : The Companies Law Amendment Bill, 2026 proposes major reforms in corporate governance, compliance, and digital regulation. This ar...
Company Law : This guide explains the complete legal procedure for shifting a company’s registered office within the same state but under a di...
Company Law : Section 56 of Companies Act, 2013 requires execution of a proper instrument of transfer for transfer of interest of a member in a ...
Corporate Law : The article explains how digital adjudication systems, virtual hearings, and online compliance platforms are reshaping India’s c...
Company Law : Provisional list of audit firms of listed companies yet to file NFRA-2 for 2023-24. Filing deadline was 30.11.2025; fines apply fo...
Company Law : ICSI recommended restoring public access to basic company master data without mandatory login requirements. The representation sta...
Company Law : NFRA introduced guidelines to evaluate audit firms’ compliance and quality control systems. The framework emphasizes governance,...
Company Law : ICSI highlights delays in marking defective forms by RoCs under CCFS 2026. It urges MCA to mandate time-bound processing or allow ...
Company Law : The issue is ambiguity in filing authority during liquidation. ICSI has requested clarity to enable liquidators to maintain statut...
Company Law : The Madras High Court permitted Nidhi companies to submit fresh replies against NDH-4 rejection orders and directed authorities to...
Company Law : Legal Analysis and Narrative Brief: Dale and Carrington Investment Pvt. Ltd. and Another v. P.K. Prathapan and Others (Supreme Cou...
Company Law : The case examined whether Tribunal approval was required for extending preference share redemption. It was held that such extensio...
Company Law : The Tribunal held that allegations of siphoning ₹30 lakh were not supported by any evidence tracing funds to the respondent. Mer...
Company Law : The Court held that a separate meeting of sub-class shareholders is not required when identical terms are offered to the entire cl...
Company Law : ROC Pune held that procedural lapses in a private placement involving one investor formed part of a single integrated transaction ...
Company Law : ROC Pune penalized a start-up company and its officers for delayed filing of e-Form MGT-14 relating to a Special Resolution under ...
Company Law : ROC Pune penalized a company and its directors for delayed filing of e-Form PAS-3 relating to private placement allotment under Se...
Company Law : ROC Pune penalized a company and its directors for utilizing private placement funds before filing return of allotment under Secti...
Company Law : ROC Mumbai-II imposed penalty under Section 450 after a company incorrectly mentioned the AGM date in Form AOC-4 XBRL. The order h...
The ROC Bengaluru imposed penalties for a 94-day delay in conducting the required board meeting, citing violation of Section 173(1). The order directs payment within 90 days and outlines the appeal process
The adjudicating authority held that failure to include an email ID on the company letterhead violated Section 12(3)(c), imposing reduced penalties due to small-company status.
Breaks down the new dematerialisation mandate under Rule 9B and its 2025 extension. Key takeaway: private companies must shift fully to electronic securities by the revised deadline.
Explains why DIN applications now require a proposed directorship and board resolution. Key takeaway: independent DIN applications are no longer permitted.
NCLAT Delhi held that NCLT erred by not enforcing valid Family Settlement Agreement since such agreement is binding and enforceable for resolving family company disputes which involves oppression and management.
Authorities imposed penalties after finding continued failure to file financial statements for FY 2019-20. The order directs rectification, personal payment by officers, and outlines appeal and compliance requirements.
ROC held that company failed to file financial statements for FY 2021-22 and imposed penalties on entity and its directors. Order directs rectification and payment within 90 days.
The ROC penalised the company and directors for not filing financial statements for FY 2020-21. The order highlights statutory penalties, compliance directives, and timelines for rectification.
RoC Kolkata levied penalties for failure to file FY 2018-19 financial statements, holding the company and directors liable under Section 137(3) of the Companies Act.
ROC Kolkata levies penalties for failure to file financial statements under Section 137(3), directing rectification and payment within prescribed timelines.
