The Companies Act is a legislation that governs the formation, functioning, and management of companies. Explore the key provisions, compliance requirements, and legal framework under the Companies Act.
Company Law : The Companies Act, 2013 and related rules now require most public and private companies to issue and transfer securities only in d...
Company Law : The Companies Law Amendment Bill, 2026 proposes major reforms in corporate governance, compliance, and digital regulation. This ar...
Company Law : This guide explains the complete legal procedure for shifting a company’s registered office within the same state but under a di...
Company Law : Section 56 of Companies Act, 2013 requires execution of a proper instrument of transfer for transfer of interest of a member in a ...
Corporate Law : The article explains how digital adjudication systems, virtual hearings, and online compliance platforms are reshaping India’s c...
Company Law : Provisional list of audit firms of listed companies yet to file NFRA-2 for 2023-24. Filing deadline was 30.11.2025; fines apply fo...
Company Law : ICSI recommended restoring public access to basic company master data without mandatory login requirements. The representation sta...
Company Law : NFRA introduced guidelines to evaluate audit firms’ compliance and quality control systems. The framework emphasizes governance,...
Company Law : ICSI highlights delays in marking defective forms by RoCs under CCFS 2026. It urges MCA to mandate time-bound processing or allow ...
Company Law : The issue is ambiguity in filing authority during liquidation. ICSI has requested clarity to enable liquidators to maintain statut...
Company Law : The Madras High Court permitted Nidhi companies to submit fresh replies against NDH-4 rejection orders and directed authorities to...
Company Law : Legal Analysis and Narrative Brief: Dale and Carrington Investment Pvt. Ltd. and Another v. P.K. Prathapan and Others (Supreme Cou...
Company Law : The case examined whether Tribunal approval was required for extending preference share redemption. It was held that such extensio...
Company Law : The Tribunal held that allegations of siphoning ₹30 lakh were not supported by any evidence tracing funds to the respondent. Mer...
Company Law : The Court held that a separate meeting of sub-class shareholders is not required when identical terms are offered to the entire cl...
Company Law : ROC Pune held that procedural lapses in a private placement involving one investor formed part of a single integrated transaction ...
Company Law : ROC Pune penalized a start-up company and its officers for delayed filing of e-Form MGT-14 relating to a Special Resolution under ...
Company Law : ROC Pune penalized a company and its directors for delayed filing of e-Form PAS-3 relating to private placement allotment under Se...
Company Law : ROC Pune penalized a company and its directors for utilizing private placement funds before filing return of allotment under Secti...
Company Law : ROC Mumbai-II imposed penalty under Section 450 after a company incorrectly mentioned the AGM date in Form AOC-4 XBRL. The order h...
Mozarc Medical India Private Limited penalized for late share certificate issuance, violating Section 56(4)(a) of Companies Act, 2013. Penalty details inside.
Khed Developers’ appeal against the penalty for lacking independent directors was denied. The Rs. 9.75 lakh penalty remains, reaffirming the importance of compliance.
Khed Developers Limited’s appeal against a ₹17.25 lakh penalty for non-appointment of a Company Secretary was denied. Read about the Regional Director’s decision.
Yapp India challenges a Rs. 14.95 lakh penalty imposed for non-filing under Section 187-C(1) of the Companies Act.
Proactive suo-moto actions on non-compliance by companies under the Companies Act, 2013, help mitigate penalties, reduce legal risks, and maintain stakeholder trust.
Read about the penalty imposed by MCA on MEGASYS HEALTHCARE LIMITED for violating Section 12(1) of the Companies Act, 2013 by not maintaining its registered office.
MCA imposes penalty on Dhanalakshmi Srinivasan Nidhi Ltd. for not including address and occupation of allottees in PAS-3 form, as per Rule 12(2).
NCLAT rules NCLT’s role in amalgamation schemes is supervisory, not appellate. Learn about the Marathon Nextgen Townships Pvt Ltd case and its implications.
Ensure compliance with the latest ROC order on SBO rules. Provide board members, shareholders, MOA, AOA, financial reports, employee details, and more.
Explore the Basic Fabric doctrine in mergers and amalgamations, highlighted by the Zee-Sony merger case and its legal implications. Analysis by Srujan Nirkhee.
