Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : The Commandant Vs Commissioner of Central Goods And Service Tax (CESTAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
The Commandant Vs Commissioner of Central Goods And Service Tax (CESTAT Delhi) Conclusion: Home guards department was an agency of state government and therefore, could not be considered as ‘person’ engaged in the business of running security services. Therefore, there could be no levy of service tax on security services provided by the Home Guards Department as it was a part of its statutory function. Held: Assessee was Commandant of Home Guards in the State of Rajasthan created under the Rajasthan Home Guards Act, 1963 for bridging the requirement of reserved police force required to mai...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930