Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Popular Constructions Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (CESTAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Popular Constructions Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (CESTAT Bangalore) The appeal was filed against an Order-in-Original passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise and Customs, Belgaum, which had classified the appellant’s activity of screening and grading iron ore as “Business Auxiliary Service” (BAS) and confirmed service tax demand along with penalties under Sections 77 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994. The Department alleged that the activity amounted to processing of ore essential for marketing the extracted ore and was therefore taxable under BAS. The appellant contended that ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930