Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Service Tax

Mere suppression of facts not enough to invoke extended period of limitation: CESTAT Delhi

Case Law Details

Case Name
Wellworth Project Developers Private Limited Vs Commissioner of CGST (CESTAT Delhi)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Advertisement
Wellworth Project Developers Private Limited Vs Commissioner of CGST (CESTAT Delhi) CESTAT Delhi held that mere suppression of facts is not enough to invoke the extended period of limitation contemplated under the proviso to section 73(1) of the Finance Act. The suppression has to be with an intent to evade payment of service tax. In absence of the same, extended period is not invokable. Facts- The appellant is engaged in providing construction of commercial or industrial building services. It claims to have discharged service tax on this service. It is also in receipt of legal and professiona...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *