Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Maulikkumar Vinodkumar Patel Vs TRO (Gujarat High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Maulikkumar Vinodkumar Patel Vs TRO (Gujarat High Court)

In this case it was held that TRO has powers to order personal summons, Penadancy of recovery proceedings before TRO entitles invoking of  Section 131, Requirement of Rule 83 of Schedule II and S. 131 requiring attendance of witness gets fulfilled when assesse appears before TRO. Absence of words “assesse” or “defaulter” does not make difference, Assessee can’t plead against personal summons that his personal attendance should not be insisted an

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31