Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

Trade Promotion Activities Recognized as Public Utility by ITAT in Trust Registration Case

Case Law Details

TaxGuru Citation
2025 taxguru.in 9681
Case Name
Jewellers and Diamond Traders Association Vs CIT (Exemptions) (ITAT Chennai)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Advertisement


Jewellers and Diamond Traders Association Vs CIT (Exemptions) (ITAT Chennai)

The Jewellers and Diamond Traders Association (“the Association”) filed an appeal before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Chennai, challenging the rejection of its application for registration as a charitable trust under Section 12AB of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (“the Act”). The application had been rejected by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), Chennai [CIT(E)] on 25 March 2025, following the Association’s filing in Form No.10AB on 19 August 2024.

The primary issue in dispute was whether the Association’s activities qualified as “charitable” under Section 2(15) of the Act, specifically as “advancement of any other object of general public utility” (GPU), or whether its operations were restricted to mutuality, i.e., the benefit of a limited class of members.

Contentions of the Assessee

The Association contended that it qualified as a “Trade Association” whose objects promoted trade and commerce, placing reliance on the Supreme Court judgment in Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax (Exemptions) vs Ahmedabad Urban Development Authority [2022] 449 ITR 1 (SC). The Association argued that the promotion of trade, including the welfare of diamond and jewellery merchants, indirectly benefited a broader section of the public by contributing to economic development.

Additionally, the assessee referred to CIT v Ahmadabad Rana Caste Association (1972 AIR 273) to assert that its activities served a class of the public, which falls under the ambit of charitable purpose. The Association also urged the Tribunal to examine whether the CIT(E)’s finding of mutuality was correct, and to pass an order on merits regarding the applicability of mutuality.

Paid content

Become a Basic or Premium Member, or log in if you are already a Basic or Premium member.

Advertisement

Author Info

CA Sandeep Kanoi
Qualification: CA in Job / Business
Company: Taxguru Consultancy
Location: Mumbai, Maharashtra
Articles Published: 19,272

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.