Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : DCIT Vs Bharti Hexacom Ltd. (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
DCIT Vs Bharti Hexacom Ltd. (ITAT Delhi) License Fee Capital, But SUC Lives On: Bharti Hexacom—ITAT Delhi Applies SC, Splits the Baby Correctly In a batch of Revenue appeals, core dispute revolved around telecom license fee, spectrum usage charges (SUC), subscriber verification penalty & discount on prepaid instruments. AO had treated variable license fee as capital expenditure u/s 35ABB, disallowed SUC, subscriber verification penalty u/s 37(1) & invoked s.40(a)(ia) r.w.s. 194H on distributor discounts. CIT(A) granted relief on all counts. ITAT Delhi partly reversed & partly uph...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930