Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Ramya Resorts Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2014-15
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Ramya Resorts Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore) ITAT Bangalore Upholds Section 69C Additions Based on Seized Material; ‘Dumb Document’ Plea Rejected The Bangalore Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeals filed by Ramya Resorts Pvt. Ltd. for AYs 2014–15 and 2015–16, affirming additions made under Section 69C (unexplained expenditure) and Section 69 (unexplained investment) pursuant to proceedings under Section 153C following a search. For AY 2014–15, the Tribunal upheld the addition of ₹37.84 lakh as unexplained expenditure towards resort maintenance. The ad...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930