This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Section 69C Addition Deleted as Source of Purchase Payments Was Explained: ITAT Mumbai
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- ITO Vs Karsan Nandu (ITAT Mumbai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2011-12
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Mumbai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
ITO Vs Karsan Nandu (ITAT Mumbai)
The appeal by the Revenue and the cross-objection by the assessee arose from the order of the CIT(A) for Assessment Year 2011-12 concerning an addition of ₹37,45,965 made by the Assessing Officer under Section 69C of the Income-tax Act, 1961 as unexplained expenditure.
The assessee, engaged in the wholesale trading of readymade garments through a proprietorship concern, had filed a return declaring total income of ₹11,81,130. During scrutiny assessment, the Assessing Officer received information from the DGIT (Investigation), Mumbai allegi...




