Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Richa Finance & Investment Private Limited Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2007–08
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download. Already Upgraded? Login here to access.
Richa Finance & Investment Private Limited Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) Section 68 Can’t Survive on Retracted Statement Alone: ITAT Deletes ₹81 Lakh Share Capital Addition Mumbai ITAT  allowed the appeal of Richa Finance & Investment Private Limited for AY 2007-08 & deleted the addition of ₹81 lakh made u/s 68 towards alleged unexplained share capital.  Tribunal held that once the Assessee had discharged the primary onus by furnishing complete documentary evidence establishing identity, creditworthiness of investors & genuineness of transactions, the addition could not be susta...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Defect in Section 143(2) Notice Format Is Curable Under Section 292B: ITAT Bangalore Cash Loan Enforceable Under NI Act Despite Section 269SS Breach: SC Kolkata ITAT Quashes Assessment as Section 143(2) Notice Was Without Jurisdiction BSNL VRS-2019 Ex-gratia Fully Exempt Under Section 10(10B): Surat ITAT Patna ITAT Deletes Search Additions Based on Retracted Statements & Estimates View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031