Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Ramsinhji Meraji Vanzara Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download. Already Upgraded? Login here to access.
Ramsinhji Meraji Vanzara Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad) 54B relief can’t be denied for non-deposit in CGAS when cheques issued before due date: ITAT grants full exemption ITAT Ahmedabad  allowed assessee’s appeal &  directed grant of full deduction u/s 54B. Assessee had sold agricultural land &  purchased new agricultural land on 14-08-2019, within the statutory period, by issuing cheques for entire consideration on the date of registered purchase deed. AO restricted deduction to ₹1.53 lakh on ground that balance amount was not deposited in Capital Gains Account Scheme (CGAS) before ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Defect in Section 143(2) Notice Format Is Curable Under Section 292B: ITAT Bangalore Cash Loan Enforceable Under NI Act Despite Section 269SS Breach: SC Kolkata ITAT Quashes Assessment as Section 143(2) Notice Was Without Jurisdiction BSNL VRS-2019 Ex-gratia Fully Exempt Under Section 10(10B): Surat ITAT Patna ITAT Deletes Search Additions Based on Retracted Statements & Estimates View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031