Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Smt. Lalitha Kuchibhatla Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download. Already Upgraded? Login here to access.
Smt. Lalitha Kuchibhatla Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad) Reassessment Quashed: Notice u/s 148 Issued by Jurisdictional AO After Faceless Scheme Held Void The Hyderabad Bench (SMC) of the ITAT quashed the reassessment proceedings for AY 2016-17, holding that the notice under Section 148 and the order under Section 148A(d) issued by the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO) after 29.03.2022 were without jurisdiction and invalid. The Tribunal noted that, pursuant to CBDT Notification No. 18/2022 dated 29.03.2022 issued under Section 151A, all reassessment proceedings and notices under Section 148 after ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Supreme Court: Cash Loan Above ₹20,000 Does Not Become Unenforceable Under NI Act Merely Because It Violates Section 269SS of the Income-tax Act Kolkata ITAT Quashes Assessment as Section 143(2) Notice Was Without Jurisdiction BSNL VRS-2019 Ex-gratia Fully Exempt Under Section 10(10B): Surat ITAT Patna ITAT Deletes Search Additions Based on Retracted Statements & Estimates Interest on Delayed Sales Tax, Service Tax & PF Payments Deductible; TDS Interest Disallowed: Patna ITAT View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031