Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Amit Dattatraya Amrutkar Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2011-12
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.

Amit Dattatraya Amrutkar Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)

Jurisdiction, DIN & 148 Defects Ignored- Failure to Decide Key Legal Ground Costs CIT(A): Pune ITAT Sets Aside Entire Order

Assessee challenged assessment framed u/s 144 r.w.s 263 for AY 2011-12 & raised multiple legal grounds including absence of DIN, wrong jurisdictional AO issuing notice u/s 148, failure to issue fresh notice after transfer, & consequential invalidity of order passed u/s 144 r.w.s 263.

Tribunal noted that assessee had specifically raised Ground No.2 in Form 35

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

IBC Section 7: SC Holds CIRP Admission Mandatory Once Debt & Default Proved; Society Intervention Denied ITAT Ahmedabad Deletes On-Money Additions; Loose Papers Insufficient Entire Bogus Purchase Disallowance Rejected When Books Not Rejected: ITAT Pune Appeal Cannot Be Dismissed for Typographical Error in Form 35: ITAT Hyderabad Agricultural Income Estimation Scaled Down: ITAT Rajkot Restricts Addition to ₹50,000 on Ad-hoc Basis View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
January 2026
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031