Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Quasar India Limited Vs Assessment Unit (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2014-15
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Quasar India Limited Vs Assessment Unit (ITAT Delhi) Delhi ITAT ITAT Sets Aside 148 Notice & Entire Assessment- Quashes Reopening for Crossing Rajeev Bansal “Surviving Period – Assessee challenged reassessment u/s 147 r.w.s. 144B arising from notice u/s 148 dated 28.07.2022 alleging bogus sales of Rs.1,17,95,000/-. CIT(A)/NFAC had upheld the reopening & addition u/s 68. In appeal, Assessee primarily contended that the notice u/s 148 was issued beyond the “surviving period” prescribed by Hon’ble Supreme Court in Rajeev Bansal & the Delhi HC judgment in Ram Balram Build...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Bangalore ITAT Restores Section 50C & Section 54F Issues; CIT(A) Cannot Dismiss Appeal for Non-Prosecution Wrong Section, Wrong Assessment: Bangalore ITAT Annuls Section 143(3) Order Passed After Search ITAT Quashes U/s 153C Assessments: AO Cannot Simply Copy Satisfaction Note Reopening Quashed: AO Added Share Capital, Loan & Premium Without Understanding Transaction Nature WhatsApp Chats, Screenshots & Suspicion Can’t Prove On-Money: ITAT Jaipur View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930