Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sunblaze Constructions Pvt. Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Kolkata)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sunblaze Constructions Pvt. Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Kolkata) Reassessment Notice u/s 148 for AY 2016-17 Quashed as Time-Barred After Rajeev Bansal—Entire Proceedings Invalid The Kolkata ITAT (D Bench) allowed the appeal of Sunblaze Constructions Pvt. Ltd. for AY 2016-17, condoned a delay of 498 days, admitted an additional legal ground, and quashed the notice issued under section 148 along with the consequential reassessment, holding the proceedings to be barred by limitation. The Tribunal held that: The assessee established “sufficient cause” for the 498-day delay due to loss of ITBA access ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

ITAT Quashes U/s 153C Assessments: AO Cannot Simply Copy Satisfaction Note Reopening Quashed: AO Added Share Capital, Loan & Premium Without Understanding Transaction Nature WhatsApp Chats, Screenshots & Suspicion Can’t Prove On-Money: ITAT Jaipur ITAT Directs TDS Refund Despite Delayed E-Verification; Revenue Cannot Retain Tax on Technical Grounds ITAT Quashes Reassessment: Approval from PCIT Instead of PCCIT Renders Section 148 Notice Invalid View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930