Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ACIT Vs SBK Trade And Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ACIT Vs SBK Trade And Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Delhi) Reopening Beyond 4 Years Quashed: ITAT Delhi Applies Rajeev Bansal—JCIT Approval Invalid, 148 Notice Time-Barred; TOLA 2020 does not extend deadlines for notices issued after March 2021 Assessee challenged the reopening u/s 148 on the ground that the approval was taken from the JCIT, Range-22, whereas for a notice issued after four years from the end of AY 2015-16, the law mandates approval of the Pr.CIT u/s 151(1). The notice dated 31.03.2021 was issued with JCIT approval based on the Revenue’s interpretation of TOLA, 2020. Asses...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Delay Condoned with Cost: ITAT Grants Fresh Chance, Slams Non-Complianc U/s 153C Valid but Addition Fails: No Incriminating Material = No Deemed Dividend 870-Day Delay Not Condoned: ITAT Refuses Relief, Calls Out Negligence & “No Sufficient Cause” Wrong Section Claim Not Fatal: ITAT Remands Matter & Nullifies Penalty Penalty U/s 270A Quashed: No Specific Charge of “Misreporting” = No Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031