Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : DCIT Vs Mangalkalash Trading P. Ltd. (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2012-13
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
DCIT Vs Mangalkalash Trading P. Ltd. (ITAT Mumbai) Protective Addition u/s 68 & 69C in Hands of Accommodation Entry Provider Not Sustainable Once Substantive Additions Are Confirmed – ITAT Mumbai The ITAT Mumbai dismissed the Revenue’s appeal for AY 2012-13 & upheld deletion of protective additions u/s 68 & 69C made in the hands of the assessee company, which was alleged to be an accommodation entry provider. The Tribunal noted that pursuant to a search u/s 132, the AO made protective addition of ₹5.90 crore u/s 68 towards alleged unexplained investment & ₹14.75 lakh u/...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Pune ITAT Deletes Section 271(1)(c) Penalty for VSI Contribution & Section 244A Interest Skill Development Institution Qualifies as ‘Education’; Section 12AA/12AB Registration Restored: Pune ITAT Only Profit Element Taxable for Transport Booking Agent; Income Restricted to 3%: Pune ITAT Investor Cannot Be Denied Section 10(35) Exemption for Mutual Fund Violations: Pune ITAT Section 148 Notice Quashed for Vague Reasons & Lack of Supporting Material: ITAT Pune View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031