This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Power Agent Cannot Be Taxed Fully- ITAT Restricts Addition to 50%
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- K. Loganathan Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2007-08
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Chennai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
K. Loganathan Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai)
The assessee, a real estate mediator, acted as a power agent and sold property on behalf of his principal, depositing sale proceeds of ₹22.05 lakh in his bank account. The AO treated a major portion of these deposits as unexplained cash and made additions along with interest income and capital introduction.
During appellate proceedings, evidence including affidavit from the principal confirmed that the assessee was merely holding funds in a fiduciary capacity. The remand report also accepted that part of the deposits and interest belonged ...




