This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
ITAT Restricts Bogus Purchase Addition as Only Profit Element Can Be Taxed
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Pruthvi Singh Solanki Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2018-19
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Ahmedabad
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Pruthvi Singh Solanki Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Ahmedabad, partly allowed the assessee’s appeal against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), NFAC, for Assessment Year 2018-19. The dispute related to the addition of Rs. 50,33,695 made by the Assessing Officer (AO) on the ground that the assessee had made bogus purchases from five entities allegedly engaged in providing accommodation entries.
The assessee, an individual engaged in the business of trading in ferrous and non-ferrous metals under the name “Vinay ...







