Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

ITAT Mumbai Condones 937-Day Appeal Delay for Elderly having health issues

Case Law Details

TaxGuru Citation
2025 taxguru.in 5979
Case Name
Hydroair Tectonics PCD PCD Limited Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number
Premium Access
Date of Judgement/Order
Premium Access
Related Assessment Year
2018-19
Subscribe to download.

Already Upgraded? Log in.

Advertisement

Hydroair Tectonics PCD PCD Limited Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Mumbai Bench, has condoned a significant delay of 937 days in an appeal filed by M/s Hydroair Tectonics PCD Limited for the assessment year 2018-19. The Tribunal’s decision, pronounced today, emphasizes the principle of prioritizing substantial justice over technicalities, particularly in light of the challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic and the advanced age of the company’s directors.

The case arose after the assessee’s appeal was dismissed by the National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi (NFAC), due to being filed beyond the statutory limitation period. Prior to this, the assessee had also been ex-parte before the Assessing Officer.

In its application for condonation of delay, Hydroair Tectonics PCD Limited presented an affidavit detailing the reasons for the prolonged delay. The company explained that its two directors, both aged 81 years, are super senior citizens with declining health. They stated that they have been the sole directors since the company’s inception in 2001, with no other key managerial personnel. The company’s operations, including inward and outward communications, were largely managed by a few support staff, with the directors’ direct involvement being limited.

A crucial aspect of their explanation centered on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. The directors affirmed that during 2020-21 and 2021-22, they were advised by doctors and government advisories to remain confined to their homes, preventing them from attending the office regularly. Their staff also primarily worked remotely during this period. Consequently, notices of hearing received via company email were not forwarded to or brought to the attention of the directors. Even a notice reportedly delivered in person to a junior staff member on March 12, 2021, did not reach the directors, leaving them unaware of the scrutiny proceedings or the subsequent assessment order.

Want to Read the Complete Judgment?

You have read the free case summary. Unlock the full judgment, the detailed judicial reasoning and the downloadable PDF, along with every other premium judgment on TaxGuru.

Read on with Premium
Goes straight to payment. GST invoice included.

One subscription covers the entire premium judgment library, not just this case.

Advertisement

Author Info

CA Sandeep Kanoi
Qualification: Graduate, CA in Job / Business, DD
Company: Taxguru Consultancy
Location: Mumbai, Maharashtra
Articles Published: 24,532

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.