Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Jayeshkumar Tulsidas Sutaria Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2020-21
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Jayeshkumar Tulsidas Sutaria Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad) Fresh Claim of VRS Exemption Allowed at Appellate Stage – CIT(A) Cannot Reject Appeal for Non-claim in Return – BSNL VRS Compensation Held Exempt u/s 10(10B) – ITAT Ahmedabad In this case, the assessee, a BSNL employee, received compensation under BSNL VRS-2019 but offered the amount to tax in the return due to lack of awareness of exemption u/s 10(10B). CPC issued intimation u/s 143(1) without granting exemption. The assessee later claimed exemption before CIT(A) relying on judicial precedents, but CIT(A) dismissed the app...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Section 68 Additions Fail: Documentary Evidence Cannot Be Ignored Without Enquiry Commission Disallowance Remanded – 133(6) Non-Response Not Sufficient; Ad-hoc Expenses Cut to 10% Stamp Duty vs Actual Value Dispute: ITAT Orders DVO Valuation ITAT Bangalore Remands ₹49L Sec 68 Addition & ₹3.74L TDS Disallowance for Fresh Verification Penalty U/s 272A(1)(d) Deleted: Reasonable Cause Subsequent Compliance Accepted View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930