Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Arihant Jewellers Vs PCIT (Madhya Pradesh High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download. Already Upgraded? Login here to access.
Arihant Jewellers Vs PCIT (Madhya Pradesh High Court) Jewellery in Transit Cannot Be Treated as Undisclosed Income – MP High Court Quashes IT Action Against Custodian & Orders Release of Consignment The Madhya Pradesh High Court, Indore Bench, dealt with the legality of seizure of jewellery consignments by the Static Surveillance Team (SST) during Assembly elections & subsequent requisition proceedings initiated by the Income Tax Department u/s 132A & reassessment proceedings u/s 148 against a mere employee of the logistics company. Background On 23.10.2023, a vehicle of Sequel L...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Interest on Delayed Sales Tax, Service Tax & PF Payments Deductible; TDS Interest Disallowed: Patna ITAT Section 54F Deduction Allowed on Genuine House Purchase from In-Laws: Mumbai ITAT Pune ITAT Quashes Reassessment as Section 148A(b) & 148A(d) Reasons Differed Section 54 Relief Can’t Be Denied Merely Due to Section 50C Addition: Pune ITAT Delhi ITAT Deletes Penny Stock Addition; Suspicion Can’t Replace Evidence View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031