Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Manish Kumar Vijay Vs ITO (ITAT Jaipur)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Manish Kumar Vijay Vs ITO (ITAT Jaipur) Form 26AS is not gospel truth – It is only a third-party information source, subject to errors-Wrong PAN Entry in Form 26AS – ITAT Jaipur deletes addition Additions solely based on 26AS data without factual verification are unsustainable- Assessee’s timely evidence of rectification and absence of TDS claim strengthens the defence. Assessee , engaged in lighting & decoration services, filed his return of income under the presumptive taxation scheme of section 44AD, declaring turnover of ₹9,01,460 & net income of ₹3,46,310. CPC, Bengaluru...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Hyderabad ITAT: Buyer’s Denial Alone Cannot Justify Section 69A Addition-AO Must Properly Verify Sale Agreement and Evidence Only Net Income of Trust Taxable Despite Section 11 Denial: ITAT Hyderabad Section 271D Penalty Deleted on Journal Entry Loan Transfer: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Demand Proof Once Bad Debt Is Written Off: ITAT Mumbai Bona Fide Wrong Head of ESOP Income not Attracts Section 270A Penalty: ITAT Mumbai View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031