Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Kishor Vitthal Kolhe Vs DCIT (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.

Kishor Vitthal Kolhe Vs DCIT (ITAT Pune)

Demonetisation Cash Deposits: ITAT Pune Partly Sustains Section 68 Addition, Grants 50% Relief

The Pune Bench of the ITAT partly allowed the appeal of an individual assessee for AY 2017-18, restricting the addition made under section 68 read with section 115BBE in respect of cash deposits during the demonetisation period.

The assessee, engaged in travel agency and petrol pump business, had deposited cash of ₹2.60

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

840-Day Appeal Delay Not Condoned; Blaming CA Not Sufficient Cause: ITAT Bangalore Educational Society Cannot Be Treated as Religious Trust Without Evidence: ITAT Bangalore Sec 270A Penalty: Immunity U/s 270AA Cannot Be Denied Without Hearing – ITAT Bangalore ITAT Bangalore Deletes Sec 69A Addition on Demonetisation Cash Deposits Explained by Earlier Withdrawals Sec 68 Addition on Opening Loans Deleted; Interest & Salary Allowed – ITAT Bangalore View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
March 2026
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031