Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sigma Paradise Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2013-14
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sigma Paradise Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi) Delhi ITAT Quashes Reopening Based on Mere Audit Objection: No New Material to Invoke Section 147 Delhi ITAT considered an appeal challenging reassessment proceedings initiated u/s 147 r.w.s. 144B. Assessee, a partnership firm engaged in cultivation & trading of agri-products, had originally been assessed u/s 143(3) on 29/12/2015, wherein long-term capital gain was computed after accepting indexed cost of purchase, indexed cost of improvement & transfer expenses. Subsequently, notice u/s 148 dated 25/03/2021 was issued on the premise that the stamp d...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930