Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Dhwani Jayeshkumar Patel Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Dhwani Jayeshkumar Patel Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad) The ITAT, Ahmedabad Bench held that entire cash deposits in bank a/c cannot be treated as unexplained u/s 68 when the assessee acts only as a commission/discounting agent and has offered commission income to tax. In this case (AY 2017-18), the assessee deposited ₹31.28 crore across five bank accounts, which the AO taxed in full as unexplained cash credits, despite the assessee’s explanation that the funds belonged to 266 third parties and were merely routed through his accounts for cash-to-cash settlement at Halol, a major plastics trading h...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
March 2026
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031