CIT (A) should discuss or decide merits of case even in ex- parte decision

CA Prarthana Jalan

Pramod Kumar Pathak Vs. ITO (ITAT Agra)

Hon’ble Agra ITAT in the case of Pramod Kumar Pathak v/s ITO in ITA No 83/Agra/2017 vide order dated 15.11.2017 has remitted the file back to the CIT (Appeals) as the CIT (Appeals) had just sustained the Assessing Officer’s order without himself discussing or  deciding the merits of the case.

The Hon’ble Agra ITAT has held as under:-

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Tags:

• CA Prarthana Jalan
• ITAT Judgments

Kindly Refer to Privacy Policy & Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.

• « Previous Article
• Next Article »

Share

Author Bio

Name: CA Prarthana Jalan

Qualification: CA in Practice

Company: N/A

Location: Uttar Pradesh, IN

Member Since: 28 May 2018 | Total Posts: 140

View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Pendency of 5,49,042 Appeals Before CIT(A)/NFAC: Request for Early Disposal Bombay HC Left Adjudication of Section 87A Rebate Eligibility to Tax Authorities CBDT Removes Discrimination in Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme Revised Guidelines for Arrest Under CGST Act, 2017 No GST on Transfer of Leasehold Rights: Gujarat High Court View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

• Join Our whatsApp Group
• Join Our Telegram Group

• 

  Review us on Google

Cancel reply

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Name *

Email *

Website

Comment

Post Comment