Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Parmanand Nagwani Vs ITO (ITAT Jabalpur)
Related Assessment Year : 2013-14
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Parmanand Nagwani Vs ITO (ITAT Jabalpur) CIT(A) Cannot Dismiss Appeals Summarily – ITAT Jabalpur Restores Three Years’ Cases for Fresh Adjudication Tribunal dealt with dismissal of appeals for non-prosecution by CIT(A). Assessee had not originally filed returns. After notices u/s 148, he filed returns, but AO completed assessments u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 147/144B making additions. Appeals filed before CIT(A) were dismissed ex parte for want of prosecution. Before Tribunal, Assessee argued that CIT(A) neither gave adequate opportunity nor passed a speaking order as mandated u/s 250(6), which requ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Reopening Fails on Both Counts: Invalid Sec 148A Notice and Time-Barred Sec 148 Render Assessment Void Coffee Income: Rule 7B Overrides Rule 7 – ITAT Remands for Segregation of Own vs Purchased Produce Duty Drawback Taxable Only on Receipt – ITAT Deletes Addition & U/s 270A Penalty Skill Development = “Education” – ITAT Allows Sec 11 Exemption to Charitable Trust No Penalty for Wrong Claim or Head of Income – ITAT Deletes Section 271(1)(c) Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930