Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Suba Valli Vilas Vs PCIT (ITAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year : 2022-23
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Suba Valli Vilas Vs PCIT (ITAT Chennai) Chennai ITAT Quashes Section 263 Revision: PCIT Cannot Invoke Revision Merely to Tax Excess Stock Under Section 69B Instead of Business Income The Chennai ITAT quashed the revision order passed under Section 263, holding that where the Assessing Officer had already conducted detailed enquiries regarding excess stock detected during search, the PCIT could not invoke revision merely because he preferred taxation under Section 69B read with Section 115BBE instead of treating the amount as business income. The assessee, a jewellery concern, was subjected to ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Section 80P(2)(d) Deduction Allowed on Interest from Co-operative Bank Deposits: ITAT Pune Section 154 Rectification Rejected as Wrong Deductor Details Required Verification: ITAT Pune Gratuity Trust Contribution and Export Commission Allowed After Subsequent Trust Approval: ITAT Mumbai Section 270A Penalty Deleted as Bombay HC Quashed Section 148 Reassessment Notice: ITAT Mumbai Section 69A Addition Deleted as AO Relied Only on Investigation Report: ITAT Mumbai View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031